About this site

neotherbusiness is a business blog where you can share views and opinions about business news and developments in Newcastle and the North-East.

Recent comments

Recent Posts

Tag cloud...

Sponsored links

Feeds

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Blog Authors

Archives

Links

Sponsored links


Enjoy Your Free Lunch While You Can

Posted by Julian christopher on August 28, 2007 10:18 AM | 

The late, lamented Spike Milligan once very perceptively wrote that 88.2% of statistics are made up on the spot.

Pausing briefly to consider the acres of ‘interesting’ PR-led survey stories that grace our newspapers at this time of the year (of which I’ve been just as guilty as the next man over the years), I’d like to offer another, slightly more accurate one that I noted recently.

More than a quarter of all the material picked up and recycled across London every day is a discarded free newspaper – and a recent trip to the capital city showed me just how this situation has arisen.

Walking between Piccadilly Circus and Waterloo Station, which is no more than a mile and a half at most, we must have had free copies of London Lite and The London Paper thrust at us by at least 20 different, but equally enthusiastic distributors, all of whom were dressed in day-glo coloured uniforms that don’t normally get worn outside the headquarters of CBeebies.

Add in the more established Metro newspaper, and the fact that these papers are actually designed to be left behind on tubes, buses and park benches for subsequent readers to pick up, and you quickly see how this mountain of newsprint rises up every day.

There’s a real battle going on in London which is expected to see at least one of these free titles go to the wall in the relatively short-term, as the battle for continually-shrinking advertising budgets reaches a crescendo, and it’s one that, in time, will be replicated in cyberspace.

The national daily and Sunday newspapers have all invested very heavily in their online presence, with even Associated Press, which had resisted taking a serious look into cyberspace until very recently, now having instigated an all-singing, all-dancing website for the Daily Mail and Mail On Sunday.

With online advertising now receiving the biggest proportion of companies’ marketing budgets, it makes a great deal of sense for newspapers to be doing this and they are all trying to get the maximum number of users to log on.

But to quote another well-known maxim, ‘there’s no such thing as a free lunch’ – and in my opinion, the free access that we currently enjoy to almost all these sites will eventually evolve into subscriber-only admission to all but the most superficial levels.

With its more specialised readership, the Financial Times has already successfully gone down this route with the admittedly-excellent ft.com, and many specialist trade publications’ websites are already all but closed to non-subscribers.

And with the drive towards offering everything possible via your PC now seemingly unstoppable, we’re going to have little choice but to sign up if we want to keep reading our preferred publications, just as anyone wanting to watch live Premiership football is tied into a loving relationship with BSkyB or, more recently, Setanta.

I suspect that we will eventually look back on the early years of this century as the ‘golden age’ of free online content – and as we do, I’m sure there’ll a PR person there writing a survey-based press release about how much better 68.3% people think things were in the old days…..

Comments (7)

Stephen Davies wrote...

Couple of points:

* 100 million blogs worldwide. All with free content.

* Online advertising surpassing print. This is expected to double in the next few years.

* Rupert Murdoch who recently bought the (paid for) Wall Street Journal is expected to make its content free.

The signs are pointing the opposite to what you say in my opinion. If, say, the Times decided to make its content paid for then surely its competitors will remain free to increase readership and thus increase ad sales.

If anything, it's a battle to win readership on their free content because the consumer has so much choice these days. Hence why the media industry is struggling to cope with the internet because advertising online doesn't convert to the same £££ as off.

Couldn't agree more about the London Lite and London Paper though. Nightmare.

Posted by: Stephen Davies  | September 10, 2007 1:41 PM

Julian wrote...

Some fair points, but of the 100m blogs you mention, I think I'd rather gnaw my own arm off than read 99.999999% of them (thanks for reading mine, by the way!).

There's a differentiation to be made between quantity and quality of content - readers of any media will swiftly migrate to on or offline content providers that they know have regularly updated, trustworthy, interesting material that fits their particularly reading criteria, and ft.com's success shows they are willing to pay for it. If there's a buck to be made, you can bet that Murdoch et all will be after it any which way.

And quite what he's going to do with the WSJ, heaven only knows!

Posted by: Julian  | September 10, 2007 2:31 PM

Stephen Davies wrote...

Agreed. But for every 10 rubbish blogs there's one good one which still leaves 10 million good ones. Or, to take a pessimistic view, if it's one in every 100 it still leaves you with one million quality blogs.

Why, as a consumer, should I allow a publication to charge me money for content that's already freely available? And why should I pay for all of that publication's content when I want to pick and choose where I get it from.

And now, thanks largely to RSS, I can.

As an example, I read the business news from the Times Online, media news from the Media Guardian, general news from BBC and local news from IC Newcastle. Those particular sections from each individual publication are what I enjoy reading. They’re my preferences and it’s going to be very hard to get me, and many others like me, to change - which is effectively taking a step back in our eyes.

And I don’t need to pay for, say, a newspaper's auto section when I have blogs like Autoblog and Net Cars providing me free content multiple times a day:

http://www.netcars.co.uk/blog/

http://www.netcars.co.uk/blog/

And should I pay to read the football section of a particular newspaper when there’s blogs like Caught Offside and Soccerlens:

http://www.caughtoffside.com/

http://soccerlens.com/

These are just a few examples but there are many more just like them.

My mate’s a publicist at ITV and he’s currently looking at the best methods to give their content away online. Two years ago, or even a year ago, a company like ITV would have never thought to give away its content for free but now they feel they have to because of the media fragmentation and to keep up with the BBC and Channel 4 – both of which are already giving their content away online.

FT.com has (I think) always been partly subscription based and obviously people (usually those with wealth and business interests) are still willing to pay for it. But I’d be surprised if any of the newspapers, both regional and national, began to charge for their online content and I think the outcome would be interesting. I’d fear the worst, however.

Re: Murdoch. I think he’ll leave the WSJ alone much like what he’s done with the Times. It seems Murdoch only likes to manipulate the tabloids.

Anyway, I’m waffling now. :-)

Posted by: Stephen Davies  | September 10, 2007 8:15 PM

Julian wrote...

Again, many fair points, though I would say that, as someone with a business to run and two small children to drag up, I haven't got the time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

I often tend to fall back on the media I know and trust, and continue, like millions of others across the UK, to be willing to pay for this on a daily basis.

Interesting to hear about ITV's dichotomy - finding ways for a commercial broadcaster to give content away for free is quite a challenge.

And without waffle, and the differing opinions it tends to contain, it's be a dull world!

Posted by: Julian  | September 11, 2007 3:11 PM

Forexman wrote...

Hi. This is really interesting post. Thank You! I have just subscribed to Your rss!

Best regards

Posted by: Forexman  | May 25, 2008 12:31 PM

Forexman wrote...

Hi. This is really interesting post. Thank You! I have just subscribed to Your rss!

Best regards

Posted by: Forexman  | May 26, 2008 10:18 AM

Forexman wrote...

Hi. This is really interesting post. Thank You! I have just subscribed to Your rss!

Best regards

Posted by: Forexman  | May 27, 2008 1:09 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)